Those that criticize the wealthy for being greedy and money seeking need to look at examples of philanthropists like Bill and Melinda Gates. They give back to the community:
Bill and Melinda Gates announced plans Friday to invest $10 billion in the fight against a number of illnesses including AIDS and said the record donation could save nearly nine million lives.
They have a lot of money, but they're putting some of it towards worthy causes. There are a lot of people who overlook this fact.
California will receive a $2.34 billion slice of the $8 billion of federal stimulus funds earmarked for high-speed rail projects, more than any other state. But that is only a sliver of the $42 billion it will need to build an 800-mile line to carry the nation's first 220-m.p.h. trains.
Illinois would reap $1.23 billion in economic stimulus awards for high-speed rail projects under President Barack Obama's plan for $8 billion in such spending nationwide.
Obama keeps ramming this idea about getting special interests and lobbyists out of Washington, but that process clearly would involve getting himself out of Washington. His favoritism towards his home state has been nothing short of shameful. I just don't understand why Illinois is getting such a big piece of a pie that quite frankly isn't that large to begin with. Selfish poltics at its best.
I hope that most of you have read Catcher in the Rye. It's one of my favorite books of all time, and I've been intending on reading it again at some point. Unfortunately, the author, JD Salinger, died yesterday of natural causes:
J.D. Salinger, the legendary author, youth hero and fugitive from fame whose "The Catcher in the Rye" shocked and inspired a world he increasingly shunned, has died. He was 91.
Salinger died of natural causes at his home on Wednesday, the author's son said in a statement from Salinger's literary representative. He had lived for decades in self-imposed isolation in the small, remote house in Cornish, N.H.
As I previewed earlier, today was Obama's State of the Union speech. In the speech, which lasted well over an hour, Obama discussed a wide range of topics, from healthcare, the economy, gay rights, a high speed rail, the supreme court and national security. What I want to do is see reactions over the different issues.
“This is a complex issue, and the longer it was debated, the more skeptical people became,” he said. “I take my share of the blame for not explaining it more clearly to the American people. And I know that with all the lobbying and horse-trading, this process left most Americans wondering what’s in it for them.”
It doesn't appear like he's getting a favorable response.
Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) said that, after watching the speech, health reform appeared unlikely to pass as one comprehensive package.
"I think right now it's less than 50-50," she said of a consolidated bill passing. "It's very hard to see a path forward in the current arrangement."
The healthcare bill has been much maligned. I personally felt that the senate was pushing it when there were other issues that were more prevalent such as the economy. I've heard criticisms from both sides and statistics and what not, but I have absolutely no idea what the bill entails. If the senate wants public support, it's important that the public know clearly how they will be affected by it. John McCain criticized the Obama administration for promising transparency, but not delivering. The healthcare issue is exhibit A.
Economy Obama has called for a new jobs bill:
Gay Rights
John McCain's response:
“In his State of the Union address, President Obama asked Congress to repeal the ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ policy. I am immensely proud of, and thankful for, every American who wears the uniform of our country, especially at a time of war, and I believe it would be a mistake to repeal the policy.
“This successful policy has been in effect for over fifteen years, and it is well understood and predominantly supported by our military at all levels. We have the best trained, best equipped, and most professional force in the history of our country, and the men and women in uniform are performing heroically in two wars. At a time when our Armed Forces are fighting and sacrificing on the battlefield, now is not the time to abandon the policy.”
President Obama will kick off his post-State of the Union tour with what aides describe as a major economic announcement -- $8 billion to begin building a high-speed rail infrastructure in multiple states.
The money is a "downpayment" on the rail system, officials said, and will go to local governments for distribution. A total of 13 major areas will benefit from the project, whose reach will be felt in 31 states, the administration said.
"With all due deference to separation of powers, last week the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that, I believe, will open the floodgates for special interests, including foreign corporations, to spend without limit in our elections."
Justice Alito was not very pleased:
"Not true, not true," he appeared to say, as he shook his head and furrowed his brow.
Conservative legal groups aren't happy either:
"The President's swipe at the Supreme Court was a breach of decorum, and represents the worst of Washington politics -- scapegoating 'special interest' bogeymen for all that ails Washington in attempt to silence the diverse range of speakers in our democracy," said Bradley A. Smith, a former FEC member and chairman of the Center for Competitive Politics.
Citizens United had this to say:
"President Obama's remarks tonight reflect a woeful disregard for the fundamental First Amendment rights of American citizens," said Citizens United President David N. Bossie.
But he added: "That being said, I absolutely support President Obama in his call for a ban on spending in American elections by foreign corporations. While I unreservedly support the rights of every American citizen to have their voice heard, there is no place for foreign actors in our political process."
It will be interesting to see how the Supreme Court ruling will be challenged in the future.
National Security Here's a taste of the reaction for National Security:
David Rothkopf, a former Clinton administration official and foreign policy expert, said Wednesday night that he “can’t recall a state of the union that devoted less time or attention to foreign policy issues than this one.”
“By the time I’m finished speaking tonight, more Americans will have lost their health insurance,” the excerpts say. “Millions will lose it this year. Our deficit will grow. Premiums will go up. Co-pays will go up. Patients will be denied the care they need. Small business owners will continue to drop coverage altogether.”
But, he adds: “I will not walk away from these Americans. And neither should the people in this chamber.”
A large reason people are losing healthcare is because they are losing their jobs. If we improve the unemployment rate and create more jobs, I have no doubt that less people will be without healthcare. Dire times lead to dire measures. Cutting healthcare is one of those methods. I hope Obama focuses heavily on improving the economy and more so takes action to improve it. He's a great speaker, but he needs to be a great president.
Looks like another wonderful technological innovation from Apple. Here's what Steve Jobs had to say:
The iPad “is so much more intimate than a laptop, and it’s so much more capable than a smartphone with its gorgeous screen,” Mr. Jobs crowed. “It’s phenomenal to hold the Internet in your hands.”
Sounds incredible, and I'm sure millions of people will flock to Apple Stores just to check it out. Here are some of the features from Apple Insider. It's Apple's world, we're just living in it.
